this is nothing to do with leeds..tp saje nak dgr pendapat fan2 lain..mungkin ramai yg dah berbual mende ni lame dah kat maple..i m not a celsi or pool fan..tp pada aku personally without a doubt gerrard lagi bakat dr lampard..cuma a few friends of mine..yg agak rapat dgn aku..yg sama2 fan bola sepak ni..bile berbual bab ni..ramai pulak ckp lampard lg gifted..dan mende ni membuatkan aku hilang punca haha ..sgt sukar utk aku menerima mende ni..aku rase lah..jikalau aku seekor celsi fan(tp aku bukan celsi fan) ..aku juga tetap dgn pendirian bahwasanya gerrard>lampard..so kat sini mcm ramai celsi fan..aku nak dgr lah some opinion especially from celsi fan sendiri..yg lain2 pun kalau nk bg ..sile whisper some words of wisdom.
20 comments:
ikhlas dari aku sebagai seorang peminat Chelsea tapi tak minat England...Lampard sangat form bila main dgn England...game semalam mmg nampak role dia sebagai midfield yg influential...tapi Gerrard sangat form dalam kelab...
sebab tu Capello bagi Lampard main tengah instead of Gerrard...tapi kalu kat liverpool, mmg dia power la...main position yg dia nak main
nice work hilmi...good post
keep it up..
but..ko xbg reason y ko kata gerrard better than lampard...
pada aku la..they both about da same
they both box to box midfielder...
shoot from range...
playmaker...
leader...
determination sama...
skill both x berapa..ala kadar je
but in strength n pace..aku rasa gerrard lebih skit
defensive sense gerrard lebih
versatility gerrard lebih..leh main 2nd striker,main side mid,main amc n dmc...lampard cuma mc n amc
tp attacking sense lampard lebih
set piece lampard lebih...
teamwork lampard lebih (suka main 1-2 while gerrard cam tamak skit)..
so aku conclude here..both lebih kurang je..
cuma pada aku buat lampard menonjol skit sbb dia lebih score byk dr gerrard lg...
n sgt2 konsisten...kalau x caya..try main fantasy..tiap2 season muka dia je yg byk mata kalau mid...gerrard kurang
gerrard lagi best...capello bagi lampard main tengah sbb die x versatile mcm gerrard.die xleh main left wing or right wing or second striker.gerrard boleh main byk posisi.bek kanan pun aku penah tgk die main.not bad jugak walaupun setakat bidan terjun.shooting ngan passing both bagus,dari segi fitness ngan stamina aku vote for lampard.dari segi speed ngn aggresion aku vote for gerrard.lampard nampak influential but hardly inspirational.gerrard ada due2 kualiti.lampard keeps things simple(i like it!),gerrard pulak suke try outrageous passing and shooting yg kadang2 jadi, kdg2 x(thumb down for this).overall, aku vote for gerrard sebab aku lebih teruja tgk gerrard main...cargas!!!lampard pulak...mmm...he is simply a c**t.
I think for you to compare Lampard with Gerrard is like comparing the Mercedez C63 AMG and the BMW M3. The BMW come with 4.0 liter producing 420 horsepower whilst the mighty c63 AMG are in 6.2 liter engine producing a glorious 451 horsepower. So which one is a better car ? Both are equal in many ways, high horsepower, desirable perfomance car, superb handling, impressive gearbox with out of the world clutching system…..but seriously which one is better ? You easily win in a straight road on the Merc, but on bending road the wild horse power is hard to contain…the M3 become the winner, than you start talking about fuel consumption, space, practicality, boot size, image, preference etc, who is better ?…. Hence the story of Gerrad and Lampard…both deliver fantastic free kick, both could engineer brute attacking force, botch could strike and found the back of the nett, both has deadly skills, bit at around similar age…but they are also good in area which they are unique to….I don’t have to elaborate further….
ape2 pun sebelum nak komen..dua2 mempunyai long shot yang bagus..cume kebelakangan ini role lampard kt chelsea lebih kepada playmaker bagi bola , cross dan sebagainya..role gerard kt liverpool gua tgk lebih kepade freerole so dia bebas nk buat pe so nampak cam gerard lebih perform dari lampard dalam premier league..dalam team england lak bagi gua , dua2 biasa je kalo nk bandingkan ngan xavi..hehe..
hujah2 aku mostly same dgn bebo..plus..lampard lambat naik..dulu tak power mane..no offense..but korg byk bg aku political answer la..pro/con..aku nak yg mcm bebo..lepas berbual..bg la gerrard (or lamp)..so now stevie g-1 fat frank -0
gua fan chelsea..tapi gerard lagi bagos...tapi utk stakat ini saja..akan datang lom tau lagi
ah...ok mi...kasi fat frank 1 dari aku...kenapa aku pilih FF...?
1. Dia ada unik role...Stevie bulih main tapi kena tgk...dari dulu bila main England dia selalu tak perform...cuma semalam meletup habis...then, skang plak Capello yg berjaya buat diaorg main dgn cantek...tapi role FF sama cuma multi-role Stevie buat dia diletakkan kat kiri...Barry plak dok kecoh "I am better than Stevie"...kenapa tak FF...?
2. Aku sebenarnya sokong FF sebab dia lebih perform for England rather than untuk club...tapi tetiba Bob tetiba remind aku...point FF kat fantasy (which mean kat liga) lebih dari Stevie...dah 2-3 season aku tgk camtu...aku just amik fantasy point sebagai ukuran la...
3. FF lebih tinggi endurance drpd Stevie...sebab dia main sume game full time sejak zaman Mour...ada la satu dua game dia kena sub...tu pon baru2 nih...Stevie penah gak skip and injured tengah season (tambah plak rafa guna rotation)...tu pon Stevie ada skip main untuk England.
jadi kasi la FF 1 from aku...
fair enuff..gua pun amik lamp fantasy..tatau sape nak buang utk sumbat stevie..endurance tu mmg a..player mcm fat frank,rooney,drogba..mcm binatang sket..susah injured..takyah warmup takde cramp2 ni..sbb tu aku amik dlm fantasy..and thank you neopujangga..finally ade pun celsi fan said that heh stevie -2 frank-1
aku x biased...
tp ko baca post aku mmg ko dah tau aku pilih frankie..
sbb dia penyumbang utama mata fantasy aku..haha
tp kalau season ni gerrard leh potong markah frankie..aku vote dia plak
so frankie 4 me...
damn bob ..but orait 2 - 2
the fact is...gerrard & lampard mmg xleh main sama...betol x?
erm..boleh main sama..
cuma dedua xleh main centre
gerrard mesti kena main side mid...
tu opinion aku la
Stevie G for me...
Aku admire dia sejak dia umur 18thn lagi.. jd captain ms umur 23thn... x ramai yg jd captain semuda tu lg2 utk big club mcm Liverpool... Very charismatic..
For me, he's better than Lampard.. (I choose Gerrard in my fantasy premier league team, cos I really believe in him)
haha amik gerrard dlm fantasy sbb believe..bagus la kau ni. jgn pilih torres tau. pilihla macheda.believe in him.hehe
x paham maksud ko maxx..
kalo aku x percaya buat ape aku gi beli Gerrard mahal2 utk fantasy PL tu? mahal gile babeng.. takkan aku nak kena beli org yg aku x percaya? hahahahhahhaha
aku x percaya kt macheda sbb dia bukan regular player..mmg sgt jarang main pun..
keje nak kutuk aku jek... mentang2 aku sorg je kem Man Utd kt sini.. hampeh..
heh so 3-2 for stevie..going once..twice..
ha tu yg aku nak tanya
mana deanited kau ni..
ko suggest dia kat aku pastu x muncul2
deanited tu tgh bz giler ngn projek kt opis... nanti ada masa dia wat la kot.. hehhe.. no idea..
bagos² aku vote for gerrard...
Post a Comment